Why are gays so upset about trump

Note: This resource was originally published on February 24,and will be updated as needed to reflect additional developments. This guide provides an overview of these actions, in the order in which they were issued. In addition, within the actions examined, only provisions directly related to health and health access are described in table.

The order why are gays so upset about trump the White House Gender Policy Council Executive Order and several Orders related to diversity, equity, and inclusion were also rescinded, as were orders related to nondiscrimination and equity in schools. Of particular note:.

It also takes steps towards ban gender care in certain area, most explicitly in prisons. Since this order was issued, there have been multiple reports of HIV programs and community health centers that have lost funding as a result of supporting programs inclusive of transgender people.

In addition, there have been reports that some health care facilities paused providing youth with gender affirming care, fearing that federal funding would be withheld according to this and another Order relating to youth access to gender affirming care see separate entry.

See court decisions below. Withholding care could lead to negative health outcomes for those that require it. At first some data was removed from federal websites, though due to court order this appears to have been restored. If public health messaging and services related to the health needs of transgender people, or other specific populations, are unavailable, this may result in adverse health outcomes such increased disease prevalence, greater difficulty with care engagement, and poor mental health outcomes.

While the Biden administration interpreted sex protections to include sexual orientation and gender identity, it is expected that the Trump administration will seek to remove these protections, as was the approach during his first term. Despite the Executive Orders and any future guidance, courts could continue to rule that such protections exist in statute.

On March 17 th the VA announced that it would phase out providing gender affirming care to comply with this Executive Order. The VA will not provide other gender affirming medical services. There have been multiple legal challenges to this Order with some judicial actions that have paused aspects of implementation:.

Directs each agency, department, or commission head to take the following actions among others :. It could also jeopardized programs and funding for agencies reaching these communities. Government, external partners, and the public, expanding on the sex-based definitions set forth in the Executive Order.

Implications: Should the federal government proceed with conditioning federal funding for schools on whether or not they support transgender students, it could exacerbate existing mental health disparities, contribute to stigma and discrimination, and reduce school connectedness.

The memo is an internal document that was leaked. It is not law but provides guidance relating to an earlier executive order aimed at limiting minor access to gender affirming care see above. The memo reportedly:.

Overview of President Trump’s Executive Actions Impacting LGBTQ+ Health

Purpose: To develop an evidence review around pediatric gender affirming medical care as commissioned by the executive order on Protecting Children From Chemical and Surgical Mutilation see above entry. It is not a clinical practice guideline, and it does not issue legislative or policy recommendations.

Rather, it seeks to provide the most accurate and current information available regarding the evidence base for the treatment of gender dysphoria in this population, the state of the relevant medical field in the United States, and the ethical considerations associated with the treatments offered.

The Review is intended for policymakers, clinicians, therapists, medical organizations and, importantly, patients and their families. The aim of the letter is to collect information on the delivery of these services and their associated costs and revenue. The effort to collect this level of information is likely burdensome for providers, particularly within a day period.

The letter appears to stoke misinformation in its suggestion that there is a lack of parental involvement or consent in the practice of gender affirming care and that regret is a serious problem in this field. It also appears to question the validity of using federal dollars to provide this care and possibly that delivering these services to minors is a significant cost-burden to the federal government.

Because just a small share of the population is transgender, and not all trans people seek medical intervention, costs are likely very low. Data collection can reveal disparities and gaps in access, which can, in turn, inform policy making to address these challenges.

Without this data, addressing these disparities is more challenging.